<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Come on&#8230; Wikipedia in the top ten for almost everything?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lavaball.com/design_development_tips/2007/06/30/come-on-wikipedia-in-the-top-ten-for-almost-everything/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lavaball.com/design_development_tips/2007/06/30/come-on-wikipedia-in-the-top-ten-for-almost-everything/</link>
	<description>SEO,  Search engine optimization</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lewis Empire</title>
		<link>http://www.lavaball.com/design_development_tips/2007/06/30/come-on-wikipedia-in-the-top-ten-for-almost-everything/#comment-1051</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewis Empire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 06:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lavaball.com/design_development_tips/2007/06/30/come-on-wikipedia-in-the-top-ten-for-almost-everything/#comment-1051</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with you.  If I wanted to find the definition of a word or phrase I would go to wikipedia myself.  Usually when I am searching for something, I expect to find a business or some other venture.

Maybe Google should just show Wiki in a seperate section and then drop them from the top 10!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with you.  If I wanted to find the definition of a word or phrase I would go to wikipedia myself.  Usually when I am searching for something, I expect to find a business or some other venture.</p>
<p>Maybe Google should just show Wiki in a seperate section and then drop them from the top 10!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
