<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SEO,  Search engine optimization</title>
	<link>http://www.lavaball.com/design_development_tips</link>
	<description>SEO,  Search engine optimization</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 20:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Content Links Pages</title>
		<link>http://www.lavaball.com/design_development_tips/2008/02/15/content-links-pages/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lavaball.com/design_development_tips/2008/02/15/content-links-pages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lavaball.com/design_development_tips/2008/02/15/content-links-pages/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I received an email newsletter from WebProWorld, that I subscribe to. A webmaster was asking if 'links pages are worth it?' I wrote in the forum to confirm that yes I firmly believe in the value of a good quality links page. A previous reply to his question mentioned that Page Rank shouldn't really be acknowledged as it is anymore. I fully agree with his statement.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lavaball.com/design_development_tips/2008/02/15/content-links-pages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google giving weight to nofollow links in social networks</title>
		<link>http://www.lavaball.com/design_development_tips/2008/01/21/google-giving-weight-to-nofollow-links-in-social-networks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lavaball.com/design_development_tips/2008/01/21/google-giving-weight-to-nofollow-links-in-social-networks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lavaball.com/design_development_tips/2008/01/21/google-giving-weight-to-nofollow-links-in-social-networks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, social bookmarking can help bring social traffic - we get plenty from StumbleUpon -, but movement in search engines? How could that work they're all nofollow links... And then it hit me.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lavaball.com/design_development_tips/2008/01/21/google-giving-weight-to-nofollow-links-in-social-networks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google spidering and indexing pages in hours</title>
		<link>http://www.lavaball.com/design_development_tips/2008/01/09/google-spidering-and-indexing-pages-in-hours/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lavaball.com/design_development_tips/2008/01/09/google-spidering-and-indexing-pages-in-hours/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lavaball.com/design_development_tips/2008/01/09/google-spidering-and-indexing-pages-in-hours/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I posted a blog on another site about lead paint in toys. The post was published in the morning and by that afternoon the post page was already indexed in Google. If you want to get your pages indexed really fast post a blog about what Google thinks is a "hot topic" and it'll get indexed in a flash.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lavaball.com/design_development_tips/2008/01/09/google-spidering-and-indexing-pages-in-hours/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>StumbleUpon a lot of traffic</title>
		<link>http://www.lavaball.com/design_development_tips/2007/09/11/stumbleupon-a-lot-of-traffic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lavaball.com/design_development_tips/2007/09/11/stumbleupon-a-lot-of-traffic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 04:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lavaball.com/design_development_tips/2007/09/11/stumbleupon-a-lot-of-traffic/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you haven't tried out the social network StumbleUpon, I would highly recommend it. Last month one of the sites that I manage had over 15,000 unique visitors from StumbleUpon.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lavaball.com/design_development_tips/2007/09/11/stumbleupon-a-lot-of-traffic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Come on&#8230; Wikipedia in the top ten for almost everything?</title>
		<link>http://www.lavaball.com/design_development_tips/2007/06/30/come-on-wikipedia-in-the-top-ten-for-almost-everything/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lavaball.com/design_development_tips/2007/06/30/come-on-wikipedia-in-the-top-ten-for-almost-everything/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 05:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lavaball.com/design_development_tips/2007/06/30/come-on-wikipedia-in-the-top-ten-for-almost-everything/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, ok, Wikipedia has relevant content, I get it. But come on, do they have to take over Google? I'm seeing them in the top ten for almost everything. How about giving the real sites a fighting chance instead of a site that talks about stuff.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lavaball.com/design_development_tips/2007/06/30/come-on-wikipedia-in-the-top-ten-for-almost-everything/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
